, 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you can Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you can Jalalzai, 2021). In this works we will work with misogyny as identified by our very own interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s six age within the electricity, particularly targeting the partnership ranging from misogynistic backlash therefore the gendered double bind figure recognized. About adopting the part we offer a nuanced meaning to have all the subcategories recognized (get a hold of Dining table 2), delivering sit-by yourself significance and you may instances about studies along side detailed analyses out of secret moments for the Rousseff’s presidency one exemplify the new dynamic between our nuanced offer for analyzing the new gendered twice bind, misogynist backlash, as well as impacts towards the Rousseff’s presidency.
The four subcategories recognized appeared in the info during the varying profile (select Dining tables step 3, 4). A couple of themes starred in higher ratio: Review so you can Guys and you can Misogynyments inspired as the comparison so you’re able to men looked in almost 50 % of every interview and you can portrayed 36 per cent of all comments codifiedments themed given that misogyny have been the majority statements (38 per cent) and you will starred in 49 percent of all interview. Put differently, interviewees was really aware out of Rousseff’s part given that president compared with other men political leaders and former presidents, while the ways Rousseff is penalized during their unique government because of gendered expectation and you will backlash.
If you find yourself appearing that have shorter volume about interview, another several layouts promote important perspective in order to facts you can sexist backlash in presidency from Brazil’s very first woman chairman. Discussions about precisely how Rousseff made an effort to comply with gendered traditional ascribed to help you women (Conforming into Twice Bind) starred in over 10 % of one’s review coded and you may interview presented. At the same time, dialogue regarding how Rousseff challenged the brand new gendered expectations of their unique position (Difficult the Twice Bind) appeared in more one to fifth of all of the interviews, constituting sixteen % of all of the comments coded.
The malfunction of your own numerical density of thematic studies brings a starting point so you can good qualitative data of each theme, concentrating on the connection ranging from for every theme, especially the relationship involving the around varfГ¶r Г¤lskar Latin kvinnor vita killar three layouts directly pertaining to the latest gendered twice join (investigations, complying, and you will problematic) additionally the misogynistic backlash one adopted.
Evaluation to help you men
One of the subcategories identified is actually evaluations from Dilma Rousseff in order to men, each other evaluating Rousseff so you can male political leaders and you may discussing how anything was more in the event that Rousseff had been a person. Therefore, we discovered that there can be each other an abstract parts and simple aspect of their evaluation in order to guys. Into the a conceptual feel, we often spotted the term, “when the she were a man” to spell it out just how a position might have starred aside in a different way had Dilma perhaps not become a woman. New story illustrated inside our interview is actually off a network that “likes guys” (Respondent 88, ), having “zero open gender discrimination, nevertheless the simple fact that [an excellent politician] are one was a bonus” (Respondent 8, ). When discussing so it evaluation much more concretely, there is a watch Rousseff’s rough character, the brand new “difficult lady around sensitive dudes.” Brand new quotation lower than brings way more context:
Discussions regarding the Rousseff’s impeachment together with sexism and you will misogyny behind the techniques had been chatted about in well-known news (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you will Kaiser, 2016) and also in scholarly performs (Zdebskyi et al
Yes, in addition they asserted that she are a challenging person, one to she could not communicate with anybody, that she got an authoritarian technique for speaking. Exactly what for men looks like an accompany “zero, he could be a painful people, a self-confident individual that understands exactly what the guy wants.” So you can their unique is demonstrated given that bad “no, she cannot can speak, the woman is difficult, she’s which” from inside the a terrible way. How they talk to us, feminine. We have attained a specific standing, we have been being harsh, we’re deviating regarding to how to become a female, that is sweet, transparent, quiet and you will for example. The type of Dilma being ‘s the sort of ladies who be able to be good in this a totally patriarchal community, against which purchase one exists (Respondent 79, ).